耀
a
r
o
6
e
d
g
2
l
p
a
n

a
r
o
n
h
s
i
a
o
w
a
s
h
e
r
e

 

 

So I am sitting here just after midnight writing a post.

The thrust of the post is to be this: I am not productive right now.

This is a terrible, terrible thing. By the time 10:00 am arrives every day, I already feel as though the day is over, as though the rest of the day is spoken for, hour-by-hour, and any freedom that I had to innovate or to act or to produce or to deviate from habit is gone. My days are over almost literally before they have begun, and the course of each day bears this terrible premonition out; starting well before noon, I begin to race to hit each necessary benchmark and, just managing to hit each one along the way, I stumble at the end of the day into evening, exhausted, with a full complement of evening tasks and events ahead of me.

My life is “full” but not in a healthy way, at least not for my self, my identity, or my future. Because very little that I care about is getting done. One thing is—there is repair work being done in my family life, and this is good, very, very good.

But a self needs to exist in order to exist, if I can frame things in such a stupidly tautological way. Right now I have no self. There is no space for a self. Between work, kids, wife, house, and recuperation, there is nothing left. No moments, and no energy.

And yet I am not ready to die. I am not ready for this to be the person that I am to be at the end of the day.

I am off the path. For so long, I felt as though I were on the path, as though I were “getting there” and what remained ahead was hard work. Now, I cannot see a path to where I want to go. I’m not even sure where I want to go, and I can’t see a path to getting to knowledge of where I want to go so that I can begin to look for the path that will take me there.

— § —

It is easy to say that this is a psychological problem, something that requires a therapist or a change in attitude or perspective, but it is also a time management problem. There simply aren’t enough minutes in the day to do the things that are already outlined, and none of them are things that I either:

a) Can change, or
b) Want to change

Asked what I would cut, my answer is “nothing, I have already cut back to the bare minimum in every facet of my life and already critical plates feel as though they will stop spinning and crash.”

How is it possible for life to be so overwhelmingly full with just work, kids, wife, house, and recuperation that none of them are getting the attention that they deserve and there is no time for anything else left?

I mean, none of these things can be cut. None of them!

— § —

I feel tremendously helpless or, put another way, in serious need of help (that is not, as of yet, forthcoming).

I hate the feeling that I am standing by and waiting for something to change or for something to give or for something to get better of its own account. I have been around long enough to know that this will not happen; nothing changes unless you change it.

The problem is that I have absolutely no idea what to change. I am at a loss.

And so, without meaning to, day by day I wait. Which is to say, I keep spinning the plates and trying to keep up with doing my stuff and trying to hit every benchmark of the day, evening, and night while also managing to stay alive and to stay healthy, and meanwhile I am watching life pass me by.

This is what it feels like.

Watching life pass me by.

It is not a good feeling.

These days when I think about careers in academics and indeed the academic project in general, I also tend to think of onerous burdens; the way in which the achievement of a productive life in the academic mainstream is a clear symbol also for a decayed and limited personal life, forsaken income, compromises in integrity and creativity, and a kind of repressed despair that results in some way from betrayed idealism.

Sometimes it strikes me that this runs in strong parallel to what we presume when we see someone that is successful, in an honorable way, in politics, particularly at the local level.

And of course in both cases, there is also the secondary truth that when we see someone in either field that is tremendously well-known and successful, we also tend to know that they have “sold out,” that they have traded integrity for financial success, have darkened their legacy with unseemly and untoward dealings of various kinds, and so on.

And in both cases, we increasingly bemoan the fact that the best and brightest young people, and particularly the best and brightest young people with high levels of honor and personal integrity, increasingly eschew participation in both spheres, often after making a start and then experiencing disillusionment along the way.

These similarities make me think that there is a deeper cultural undercurrent here that informs both situations, one that deserves some thinking and analysis.

If only I was still in the business of doing this sort of thing. Who knows, in the future I may be again. But for the moment, I count myself amongst the number that I have just described, fully aware of the irony of the situation, and of this post.

The first inkling I had that many, many academics in the arts and letters weren’t all they were cracked up to be was when I heard some Very Serious People at a Very Serious Institution that I attended getting readings of some big theorists very, very wrong. During my second stint at grad school, this happened again.

The most obvious incorrect reading is that of Jean Baudrillard and the concept of simulation. This is almost universally fucked up by… people. Everywhere. Again I read tonight on a very prominent website, on which someone is trying to explain something to a popular audience using Baudrillard, that simulation is an “amazingly realistic copy” and that hyperreality is a “world in which the copies are more real than the original.”

Over and over again I hear this stuff, since my first stint at grad school in 2003.

NO.

Simulation is the direct production of a non-original without any original. Rather than being “made” as an original thing is, a thing is instead “simulated” into existence.

Hyperreality is a world in which there are no originals or copies, only simulations. That is the entire point of the theoretical framework. There are no copies. It is not about copies. This is not about the fidelity of copies, the fantasticness of copies, the multiplicity of copies, the modernism of copies, the acceptance of copies, or anything else involving copies.

That is the point. To oversimplify too much (but it seems necessary), there are no copies in hyperreality, nor are there originals. There are only simulations.

It is not a framework about fake realities, imperfect realities, secondary realities, derivative realities, regrettable realities, or anything else of the sort. It is not a critique of social media implying that we’d all be better off talking face-to-face. It is not a critique of mass-produced consumer goods implying that we’d all be better of with hand-crafted goods instead.

Jean Baudrillard was not agreeing, prior to the fact, with your Luddism. It is an account of a particular mode of production that is perfectly informational and cheaply and infinitely informational, and in which notions of originality and reproduction thus no longer apply because the parsimoniously identifying characteristics of the “original” and of the “copy” in previous modes of production no longer apply.

For some reason, after all these years, there is nothing that makes me more ill than the naive, simply incorrect, account of Baudrillard that is used everywhere to (darkly and incorrectly) illuminate just about everything.

Academic culture is sick, particularly in the arts and letters.

That’s not to say that the pursuit is misguided in itself, but rather that the ideological, behavioral, organizational, and interactive conventions that have come to surround and embody it are now maladaptive. It is, in effect, a culture designed to chase away anyone with brains and self-respect, despite themselves.

And, as if on cue, the Chronicle of Higher Education has begun to police their comments section heavily to quiet the disaffected voices of young academics that have lost hope or that are leaving the academy behind. Rather than embrace their relevance as a space of discourse on the present and future of academic production in the United States, they have become metonymous of the problem itself by simply disallowing comments on any story likely to rouse the rabble and heavily moderating comments elsewhere to ensure that only “the right kind” of comments are allowed.

The result is very tweedy, very demonstrative of serious restraint and discretion, and very fake. It’s bullshit, like much of what passes for inquiry and academics these days—and I don’t mean the “productivity” (articles, books, etc.) but rather the epistemic and cultural regime that surrounds them.

There’s a reason that STEM is where it is relative to the arts and letters, and it’s not entirely to do with the rational-instrumentalist ethos of a technology-capitalist society, or with the historical specificity of the trajectory of the patriarchy, etc. Some of it is because the STEM folks are more interested in their present work and in doing/seeing more of the same from others than in preserving their social privilege, status, and identity. (And, N.B. converse to the point, the present work that they are interested in is emphatically not that self-same social privilege, status, and identity, which they find to be boring.) They’re just too damned geeky to give a shit about what’s going on around them; they can’t stop thinking about their robot/laser/proof/etc.

That this enthusiasm is lacking in the arts and letters to such an extent that the enterprise becomes an often transparently self-serving exercise in posturing and public performance tells me that either some much-maligned names have been correct and history is over or that the Right People that the arts and letters are trying to protect are, in fact, the Wrong People in a national and incestuous club of middle-school cliques and intrigues, with the Actual Right People mostly operating and doing interesting work elsewhere, where there is no “game to play.”

This begs a rhetorical question: Where have all the arts and letters geeks gone?

No, not the professoriate. The geeks. And why are they no longer one and the same?

— § —

Whenever you find yourself saying “I don’t have time to…” it should be taken as a strong clue that you very much need to tell yourself to “make time to…”

So here we are, Valentine’s Day tomorrow.

It’s the middle of February, far removed from the week at the end of July when the world exploded and everything went to hell. I’d thought we’d be shopping for a house with a pre-approved loan by August. And then we just plain weren’t.

Now we’re talking in fits and starts about renting an apartment, somewhere down the road. Funny how things change. Everything old is new again. Hard to know whether to laugh or cry.

— § —

Scalia is dead.

I don’t know anyone in my circle that is particularly broken up about this. Most everyone is ready to dance gaily on his grave, myself included.

On the one hand, it’s got to be tough—as his family—to know that this is how people felt about him.

At the same time, there must be, at the very least, a hint of satisfaction in knowing that he was so important that virtually nobody is neutral on the fact of his death. The man mattered, whether for bad or for good. He left marks on the lives of many millions.

That is something very few people can say, at the end of their lives.

— § —

My wife and I were talking about confidence earlier. Specifically, how I’ve always had it and it’s something she associates with me.

I didn’t tell her then, though I thought it, that while this has been true for my entire life, it is not true any longer.

Yes, I once was sure that everything was always happening within the framework of the plan that I had for things and for my life, and I felt able to deal with just about any contingency that came along, and I felt as though over the course of decades I’d never deviated too far from where I wanted to be, and I was positive that I was going to get to where I was going, and that I would progress competently along the way.

I once felt all of these things without much doubt.

These days, it’s fair to say that my confidence has been—to be blunt about things—shattered. What do I believe in any longer? Myself? Certainly not. That disappeared sometime in 2014. Paradoxically, within the context of my family life, achieving a sound income and completing my Ph.D. shattered my confidence.

Because these were supposed to be significant items of progress, and instead, they threw my identity, home life, and future into turmoil. Things got steadily worse, rather than finally better.

The result was that I could no longer be sure about anything any longer. Not what I wanted, not what it would mean to others around me, not who I wanted to have around me.

I can now say with some confidence (perhaps the only thing that I’m confident about) that I entered a mid-life crisis upon defending my dissertation and I have not yet fully emerged. In this crisis, everything will be re-evaluated.

I initially wanted to re-evaluate only where and when necessary, to make only the changes necessary. But I’ve had to walk farther and farther back and to examine things under harsher and harsher light until I found myself standing under blinding lights at the edge of a precipice.

I am still examining.

Decisions will have to be made and actions taken, by both of us, before too long. We can’t live in the “hedges” (so to speak) forever.

— § —

What do I want out of the second half of my life?

This remains the key open question.

You arrive, as I have, at forty and you are forced to admit to yourself and others than you cannot ultimately be happy about everything. It is impossible to arrive at a state in which you are pleased with every element of your life, no matter how hard you work, because your ideal states for various elements of your life would be in conflict with one another, irreconcilable.

So it becomes a game of sacrifices. Which things are the things I want to give up on? In which particular ways do I choose to suffer, so that in other ways I can be happy?

Because everyone sacrifices. Everyone suffers. The only question is which sacrifices and forms of suffering you choose, because it is these that enable the other parts of your life to be happy.

My condolences to the person that refuses to sacrifice or to suffer on any point, that won’t compromise anywhere. They’ll also fail to find happiness anywhere, in any part of their life.

Such people are doomed to a life of suffering by virtue of being in eternal purgatory. Nothing is ever achieved, but nothing is ever off the table. Today, for them, never comes, though tomorrow always looms frustratingly near on the horizon.

But it’s an illusion. One, happily, that I am—as the result of all of this—significantly unlikely to fall victim to.

— § —

Some abstract “wants” for the second half of my life:

– I want my family to be intact
– I want myself and my wife to be happy with one another
– I want to stay married
– I want my Ph.D. to matter
– I want to help young people and society
– I want to have a strong connection to academics and public knowledge
– I want to write and to be known for my writing in new ways
– I want to preserve a significant portion of my independence as a brand and laborer
– I want to multiply my income stream at least by a factor of four
– I want to be debt-free
– I want to own multiple houses
– I want to live in a dense urban area
– I want to be involved in many meaningful projects at any given time
– I want my children to one day be proud of my career
– I want to support them well in building the lives that they want
– I want to feel as though I’ve preserved some semblance of self and integrity
– I want space to think
– I want happy memories
– I want to be multilingual
– I want to be expert in multiple subject areas
– I want to remain intellectually active and productive until the end

It’s not yet clear to me which of these things can go together and which are in conflict with one another, much less which of them can actually be achieved, without any particular consideration for the other wants in the list.

— § —

One of the reasons roses are so attractive is that they look as though they’re made out of thin, red leather, and leather is a material that is highly evocative of the emergent experience of life in kingdom animalia, phylum chordata, subphylum vertebrata, class mammalia.

It is as though they are the most mammal-like of all plants in some way.

Or maybe this is weird, I don’t know. I grant that the vegans would be upset. But then, the vegans are all insane and possibly morally bankrupt, so it doesn’t matter much.

Oh, don’t get the vapors. I know, I used to be one of them, and I ran in those circles extensively. Veganism is the behavioral expression of psychological defense mechanisms resulting from childhood trauma, in one way or another.

I’ve never seen a case in which I didn’t believe this to be true, myself included.

— § —

Let’s see, what else can I say to offend or to get myself dismissed as a serious person?

— § —

No matter.

Happy Valentine’s Day, everyone.

It’s been many years since I spent time reading childrens’ literature. Because of my educational background, I graduated to the “serious stuff” pretty quickly; by fifth grade I was reading Cervantes’ Don Quixote and so on.

But there was a time, a time long, long ago, when I read George Selden, Beverly Cleary, and other authors of children’s fiction.

And now that I’m the father of a five-year-old girl, I’m getting the chance to read them again, aloud.

— § —

Over the fall, we went through all of George Selden’s books, starting with The Cricket in Times Square, which the kids absolutely loved. They loved his books so much, in fact, that we read a couple of them (including that one) twice.

Then, we read a couple of books about Ralph S. Mouse, including most notably The Mouse and the Motorcycle, which they also loved.

And now we’re on the seventh book of Beverly Cleary’s Ramona Quimby series, Ramona Forever.

What’s dawning on me, as I experience these stories once again, this time with kids of my own, is just how fabulous they are. With one book left before we’ve covered all of Ramona’s books, we’ve watched this girl grow up, all of us enthralled.

The stories are endearing, beguiling, and fun. Ramona, in particular, reminds me so much of my own daughter—irrepressible, tempermental, misunderstood, intelligent, hopeful, sensitive and indignant—that it’s almost eerie. But the other books have been wonderful as well.

Far from being a chore, reading childrens’ fiction again has been incredibly rewarding. These are, quite simply, very good books that are a joy to read.

My infinite thanks to the authors of childrens’ fiction for doing what they do. The world is a far, far better place for their efforts.

— § —

With that said, I’m at a bit of a loss about what to read after George Selden and Beverly Cleary. It’s been a while and my memory of other childrens’ authors isn’t clear. This may have something to do with the fact that I graduated from childrens’ fiction so quickly when I was young.

I suppose it’s time to pick up some second and third grade reading lists to see what’s hot out there these days.

Leapdragon is back to appearing, on average, on the first page of results for “Aron Hsiao” as of today.

I didn’t anticipate how good this would feel. Like coming home to myself. Once upon a time, it was always the first result. Maybe we get there again before too long. That would be cool.

Not that it would be good for future career prospects. But then at the same time, I’m 40 years old. What’s the point in keeping the powder dry any longer? I’m on the path I’m on. There’s no point in being conservative at this stage of the game; most of my working life is behind me.

— § —

I tend to be impulsive and spontaneous about the everyday flow of life, but I tend to be the opposite—unhelpfully conservative—when it comes to the structure of life. In a very real way, I use domestic, financial, and self-identity stability as a base from which to operate freely and fluidly in day-to-day endeavors. So it is that I don’t have a calendar, tend to operate moment-to-moment, and in fact calendars make me bristle, yet I struggle to remain calm when things in my “foundation” change.

This also goes for public persona and communication projects. I waited for years thinking that I ought to make this change in my public persona, and now that it’s happening, I’m both excited and tremendously nervous.

— § —

Thursdays are my “context switch” days now. And as everyone in CS/CE knows, context switches are “expensive.”

So it is that on Thursdays I tend to be less productive than on any other day of the week.

Oh well.

(1) Bernie Sanders appears to be reassembling the old FDR coalition. It has been absolutely dead since Reagan, though there was a bit of a breath around the Clinton years, until NAFTA. This is fascinating to watch. My curiosity is biggest around why. Why does this old socialist Jewish guy finally connect with working class whites in particular and get them to stop voting against their own interests? What is the cultural resonance? Is it merely the appeal to justice rather than policy?

(2) Being back in Utah, and leaving my previous posts and my previous place of residence has been tremendously bad for my ego and confidence. Whereas I felt like a “somebody” before, I feel like a “nobody” now. The effects of this shift are not purely emotional; confidence plays into performance and performance into confidence. It has been a downward spiral for a long time. I need to find a way to reverse this spiral. Large audiences once again are probably the easiest way to do this.

(3) Days have a way of ticking by like seconds. Something is put off until “tomorrow” and this “just once” and suddenly it is months later. This is how lives slip through fingers. There is a bit of a literature on the notion of “living consciously” and figures as vulgar as Oprah have had something to say about the notion. It’s time that I paid attention to this as well. Less than half of my life is left. I need a plan and, more prosaically, a calendar. That I stick to.

(4) The trouble with Chinese New Year in middle America is that it’s impossible to celebrate it correctly. None of the community-oriented things actually occur, from puppet dances to the general collective effervescence. Imagine having to celebrate Christmas, only with no Santas at the malls, no sales at the big box stores, and no coverage in the media. Just you and a tree and some candles. It wouldn’t be the same; much of the inherent beauty and joy would go unseen by most.

(5) The IZGO display panel on my aging iPad air is beginning to show signs of backlight degradation of the sort that I saw in a lot of display models, with dimming at the left and right vertical edges. I wonder if this is something to do with dust attraction (as is common on laptop panel backlights) or a more fundamental design issue, since it is occurring at both edges (is there a backlight source at both edges? I haven’t looked).

(6) It is time once again to get the Volvo safety inspected. This is a huge pain in the ass. In fact, cars in general are a huge pain in the ass. Only a few minor things need to be done, but I do not have the wherewithal or the time to do them myself, and being without a car for a few days, even here, is a tremendous logistical nightmare. I am not happy about this. Perhaps my wife is right and it’s better to buy new. New cars need to go to the shop, too, but the shop needs are less of the minor, maintenance-centric variety that pop up once a year. I’d gladly pay more per needed repair, as is typical for new cars, if the frequency of needed repairs were lower and they didn’t always happen at the same time every year.

(7) My mother continually argued that the ability to play the piano would be one of the most important skills I’d have in life. She spent years and many dollars trying to develop sound piano-playing skills in me. I am not sure to this day that I have encountered a single situation in my entire life in which playing the piano would have been of any benefit to anyone at all. On the other hand, the five distracted minutes that she spent showing me how to thread a needle, tie a knot, and sew a button back on a shirt have proven their value again and again, doubly so now that I’m a parent. And I regularly wish that I knew how to operate a sewing machine, and that my stitching and related skills were better. Note to parents: fuck piano, teach them to sew.

(8) Vision is a sense so central to my understanding of the world and the meanings that I make of it that even the sight of a goldfish with cataracts is enough to touch me and lead me to feel deep pity. I don’t know what I’d do with myself if I were to lose my vision, and I hope I never have to find out.

(9) The Sanders campaign has made me hopeful about politics and about the United States as a project of nationcraft in ways that I have only felt once before in my life, during the Obama campaign. Unfortunately, Obama largely dashed those hopes by abandoning the bully pulpit in favor of the moderate technocrat’s fine suits. Sanders right now has the pulpit. I hope he continues to use it and sees the long-term imperative that is at stake it continuing to hold fast to it.

I have no idea what I’ll do when spring arrives again. I cannot possibly imagine myself “fixing sprinklers,” “mowing lawn,” and “trimming bushes.” The very thought is bewildering and repulsive to me.

I saw a YouTube video in which Hillary Clinton felt emotional on the stump and cried.

I do not ever, ever want to see Hillary Clinton cry.

Is that sexist? I don’t know. I just know that it was terribly, terribly wrong in oh-so-many ways.

— § —

I have been working on a kind of “universal cultural calendar” at work for reasons that are beyond going into here. It is a slog.

Sleepy convergences accumulating… For example, here are things that all happen at roughly the same time this year:

– Back-to-School season
– The height of US election campaign season
– The latest Bridget Jones film
– The remake of Ben-Hur
– Burning Man
– The Retail Global conference in Vegas
– Start of football season
– Major league baseball pennant race
– Apple’s fall event
– U.S. Labor Day
– Formula One in Belgium and Italy
– eBay Fall Seller Update

Woohoo?

— § —

DC current falloff is more-than-linear in relation to cable length. Does this also apply to conductor volume? I forget, but I doubt it.

Where did all my electronics knowledge go? I feel as though I’m intuiting this stuff.

Upshot: If you buy a nice, long six foot cable to charge your phone, it’s going to take a lot longer than it would with a three foot cable. And if you buy a twelve foot cable, it might just be charged by next week.

I just read a Washington Post article on how Jeb Bush’s campaign is picking up after a few weeks of looking as though it was a cadaver. It’s not by any means a winning proposition yet, but the fact is that it is still alive.

Hillary Clinton, meanwhile, remains the prohibitive favorite on the Democratic side of the aisle, though she’s slipped a bit in recent days. Still, the race to the nomination remains hers to lose.

And so it is that tonight for a moment I found myself realizing that it remains within the realm of possibility—not likelihood perhaps, but certainly possibility—that we will have a Bush vs. Clinton general election.

Again.

And that thought is so thoroughly disgusting and intolerable to me that I almost can’t continue breathing. If that happens, the U.S. deserves to be fired—absolutely fired—from its role as a mover on the world stage.

Fuck that shit. Ugh.

— § —

Meanwhile, I’ve realized that this is my first post in a couple of days. A bit of a dark gap had spread across the landing page of Leapdragon.net.

Good.

There was no way I could maintain the pace I’d been keeping there for a while and still have any time left for things like wife, kids, job, pets, or self.

From time to time, I seem to have these explosions of typing that overtake life and blog. But I’m always also glad when I notice that they’ve come to an end, because there’s something vaguely unhealthy about them.

They can make you wonder about canary-in-coal-mine kinds of phenomena and indicators.

— § —

Chinese New Year is now behind us once again.

On a whim earlier in the day, I suddenly drove with the kids to the Chinese food store for (from their perspective) honedew melon ice cream and for (from my perspective) little red envelopes.

I’ve now done my cultural duty as a parent for the first time ever. It was sort of fun, in a weird I’ve-become-my-grandfather sort of way.

— § —

One of the things I’m still waiting for in life is for someone to start making WR 3 ATM G-Shock tablets and phones with sapphire displays and so on.

I know it’s technically supremely difficult to do, but I remain hopeful that before too long someone will. I’ll be all over it when that happens. I’ll pay a premium quite happily.

Electronics are getting to the point where we don’t need additional capability so much as we need improved durability.

Give us a really reliable five years out of each device, like you get out of a car or a household appliance, and you can charge at least two to three times as much.

— § —

At first I was not sold on the idea of Citizen’s Eco-Drive watch movements in comparison to a good, old-fashioned 21+ jewel automatic, but they’re growing on me.

Even with the non-sweeping second hand and the idea that inside there’s basically another consumer electronics device lurking to quantize more of life.

— § —

Tomorrow, sadly, is a workday.

Somehow, right now, I’m really, really feeling as though I wish it were a free day. I want to take the kids and just go play somewhere. Shoot the breeze. Burn a day.

Because sometimes the best way to make sure that a day isn’t wasted is to… waste a day.

— § —

Sometimes you make a post just to hear yourself think. Yes, it’s true, oh, the vapors, the they’re-all-narcissists-on-that-internet-thing vapors!

But QED.

And also note that I didn’t post it (or anything today, or even recently) on Facebook.

Because Facebook and Twitter and social media in general are increasingly a drag.

“The thrill is gone, baby…”

It’s 2002, sometime in the months following the Salt Lake 2002 Olympic Games.

I’m in East Canyon—I think—and carrying an Olympus E-10 camera. I’m in the middle of nowhere in particular. I’ve parked the car by the side of the road and hiked off the road by a few hundred years into a kind of clearing. It’s grassy and a basic mix of green vegetation, gray rot, and little remaining wisps of white snow. It must be just before springtime arrives in earnest.

It’s about one o’clock in the afternoon, and I’m alone.

I walk around for an hour or two, talking random snapshots of nothing in particular. Leaves. Branches. A couple small animals. Nothing worth remembering. There’s no art to be found in anything that I do or produce on this particular afternoon.

And yet it’s burned into my memory as one of the best afternoons of my life. Me there, alone, in the middle of nowhere in particular in the mountains, doing nothing in particular for no particular reason. Just walking, looking, and breathing.

— § —

It’s late 2010 or maybe early 2011 and I’m standing in front of my kitchen table in Astoria, Queens. I’ve just decided to turn down a job offer from the United Nations because I’m teaching at CUNY and at NYU and I’m more than satisfied with what I’m doing, even if it offers less money and less job security.

In fact, as far as I’m concerned, my life is perfect. In that moment, I have everything I’ve ever, ever wanted. It’s the high water mark of my life so far. I want to be there forever. I can feel my career about to take off, and I can feel the city around me embracing me, carrying me along into the future.

Also burned into my memory as one of the best afternoons, in the midst of the absolute best period, in my life.

Everyone should have at least a few moments like that—moments when you feel as though all of your dreams have come true and you’re living “the good life.”

— § —

On Cannon beach in 2003, I took a nice street portrait of a distinctive looking man with olive skin, a strong jaw, stubble and a newsie cap holding his small son—maybe just under a year old—and smiling.

That tiny kid is now a teenager. I wonder what his life is like. I wonder if his dad is still alive, and if their relationship is still the close bond that it seemed to be then. I wonder if they still live in Oregon.

I wonder if the lived in Oregon to begin with. When I took the photo, I asked if I could snap only by gesture. Then, I snapped and went on with my evening. We never exchanged any words.

— § —

I’m not on board with the western cultural project of the last few decades of making all things and all people equal in every way, conceptually.

Some things are better than others in some ways. Different situations require different tools. People are not the same. Sometimes you’d rather see one person than another. This is not based on nothing.

As Marx implied without meaning to, all things are not equal. All things are not interchangeable.

The notion that this would be just and ought to be pursued has something to do with the price of fish in China. And lots of other prices in lots of other places.

— § —

When we were working to adopt our dog of (now) eight years, he was just a puppy in a Manhattan shelter. He’d been rescued from the streets of Brooklyn and had significant anxiety and leash aggression. They weren’t going to let us adopt him without demonstrating a commitment to care and to train him conscientiously.

We’d go in the afternoons to spent time with him, and later, to walk him. It took us weeks to train him to the point where we could walk him in Manhattan without leash aggression or pedestrian aggression, but we got there after a lot of visits over weeks and weeks. In the afternoon, he’d wait for us in the window. When we came, he’d be standing, pointing. We went there every single day.

Every day except one.

We’d been sitting in Bryant Park spending time together on a variety of things when we both suddenly looked up at one another, after weeks of not missing a day, and realized that we’d forgotten to visit him and that by now the shelter was closed.

I still regret that mistake.

— § —

Life goes on. It always goes on.

I love that and I hate that at the same time.

You never forget the faces of the people that have really harmed you. At least, I don’t. I haven’t.

— § —

Take the bullies, for example. When I was five, or seven, or eight, or nine.

There was J.H., the giant white supremacist boy with the round head and the rosy cheeks. E.D., with the small, brown face and the curly hair, who was always grinning, even when he was laying into you—or rather, especially when he was laying into you. T.W. and T.V., the “twin Tommies” as they used to be called, one blonde and dirty, with a giant mouth and a strangely square jaw for such a young boy, the other with a tall, thin face and an angular chin and nose, dotted with freckles.

How many times was I beaten up? Hard to say. But I remember their faces; I could sketch them from memory to photo perfection, even now, if I could draw at all.

Strangely, to me they’re all adult faces. They were that even at the time. I can, if I squint with my mind’s eye very hard, these days sort of just catch glimpses of the child in them. But to me, the bullies will always all look like adults; the nice kids like children.

I think that’s one of the reasons I’ve always had an ambiguous relationship to adulthood, though I know that it didn’t originate with the playground gang.

But it is fair to say that for me, there is a fairly strong subconscious connection between “adult” and “bully.”

And given that I’ve always experienced the world in this way—that adults are bullies and bullies are adults, and that’s simply how it is—why would any nice person ever want to grow up?

But more on this later.

— § —

I can’t remember many of the faces of the people I’ve loved over the years.

I couldn’t, for example, draw any of my grandparents’ faces from memory, even if I had the skill to do so. I just don’t clearly remember them without looking at photographs.

My first girlfriend? She’s more a collection of facts to me than a face or a physical being. What did she look like? She had blonde hair. I remember that much.

Favorite professors during my undergrad years, in both of whose classes I sat for hour after hour, many semesters in a row? One is a beard. The other is a nose and long, curly hair.

They’re presences in my memory, but they’re not the visceral, true-to-life portraits that I retain of the harmers.

— § —

I read recently that a certain population of people that end up in therapists’ offices are, deep down, seeking justice for past wrongs—only they can never get it, no matter how long or hard they try.

They identify the closest behaviors that they can in their loved ones, then impose irrational punishments and seek pleading apologies for these behaviors—but it is never enough. The events of the past remain unaltered and unaddressed by this quest for justice, forever. The original wrongs can not be righted or equitably adjudicated; the original perpetrators can never forced to pay then, when it mattered, for those wrongs.

The statute of limitations long ago ran out; the loss is forever. Loved ones generously suffer, inadequately and thus infuriatingly, in their stead—with no end in sight, because the job can not be completed.

— § —

I don’t think I see much of myself in this account (and indeed the quote had nothing directly to do with me, but that I think it’s insightful). I hope that others aren’t busy seeing all the time what I don’t see in this case. It is a vain but healthy hope.

I wish I could give more detail about the population being referenced, but I can’t. Just as I can’t give the full names of the bullies. Just as I can’t often say many of the things that I think and feel and remember here.

Because there would be victims. That is also a part of the injustice of suffering at the hands of others; even if you are able to directly confront those responsible, the attempt to extract justice turns them into victims, rather than into vanquished trophies that are metonymous of evil.

If you’re a good person, you can’t get yours back. That’s why you’re a good person.

— § —

Of course, it’s also worthwhile to point out that if time passes, they may also be victimzed, rather than cleansed and chastised, by attempts to extract justice simply because they have changed and grown.

The playground gang, for example, is frozen in my memory as they were then. I have no knowledge of anything that became of them—whether J.H. ultimately grew up to be a nice person and left behind the white supremacist tendencies that had undoubtably been inculcated in him by his parents, or whether T.W. perhaps went on to found a school for impoverished and suitably starving children somewhere in the third world.

Perhaps both went to university, got married, had children, and give to UNICEF. To expose them now would somehow be unfair. Maybe one of them has a suicidal daughter that is even now being beaten up daily on the playground, and clings to her father as her only lifeline. How would she experience the revelation that her father was once just such a bully?

For me, however, they are forever the playground gang. That is where their growth stopped; those are the faces from whom recompense ought to be extracted. These other potential souls, perhaps grown older and wiser and with families to support—the ones that I cannot expose—are merely the accessories that protect, in their younger selves—the war criminals.

They do this by allowing themselves to be victimzed instead, if they are named, all these years later.

— § —

In a way, I could say that I was born on the first day of kindergarden in a public school on the west side, when I turned up as a small “Chinese” boy (there was no concept of mixed race on that playground at that time; you were either white or you weren’t) and was held down and beaten and kicked senseless until I lost track of anything happening to me. I’d later regain my senses in the nurse’s office as I waited for my mother to arrive.

— § —

I could, instead, say that I was born on the day that my mother first took a belt to me (yes, it was always my mother) with wild rage in her eyes, rage that told me that she felt she’d been violated somehow by me, a tiny boy. It was a brown belt, and it flew, overhand, again and again toward me as I lay, prone, on her bed.

Of course, I’ve posted before about these violations that I committed and that caused me to deserve such treatment. I was rather clueless about them at first, just as I was clueless about the sin of not being white.

In my mother’s case, they came mostly in the form of disappointments—my failure to be the ideal little man that she needed me to be, for her safety and for her own emotional stability and security.

As I recall, the first time it happened it was because I had said the word “damn” out loud.

In fact, I didn’t know what the word meant. I’d learned it, ironically, from the playground gang during a beating, and knew only that you said it when emotions were running high.

I learned that day that it was a magic word that could also cause emotions to run high of its own account.

Later on, I’d learn that victimhood is the secret result of having had power all along—a dangerous lesson that I (and too many others) will spend a lifetime trying to unlearn.

But I digress.

— § —

Those that live in the eternal quest for justice were, I suspect, born in the same way, and probably also many times, each time into trauma.

Together, these crimes and primal scenes form a narrative of the eternal relationship between the creation of the self and injury; between identity and the failure of justice to obtain.

The self born enough times this way is a self whose chief property is that of rendering the world itself morally flawed by virtue of the judicial failures of which it is in some way the founder.

— § —

I often wish that I could share more. Name names. Poke eyes. Tell the stories as they were, in public.

But I have no interest in creating victims from the bullies, for the most part. I’ll know that it’s time to tell the stories when they can be told without the possibility of encountering that paradox, of living that surreal emotional conflict by which justice can only be visited upon the innocent.

— § —

In the meantime, here’s to the selves and the bullies that made them. And (the one name I’ve named, for better or for worse) to the parents that ensured, paradoxically, that the children they sought to punish for being children would forever associate adulthood with the unjust pursuit of power, trapping them forever in the state of justly empowered Peter Panhood from which they were meant to be forcibly expelled.

A state and a world in which birth inevitably has something to do with near-death and in which the state of being grown up is invariably just shy of—at best—being fucked up.

At some point in your late childhood, you are relieved to find that hours, rather than dragging on seemingly forever, have begun to fly by.

By the time you reach early adulthood, you’re a bit taken aback to realize that days are now flying by.

Then you wake up one day in middle age to realize that weeks and months now seem to disappear in an instant.

The velocity at which the life-trajectory is completed is not a constant, but rather increases exponentially.

This is conventional wisdom, of course. But it bears restating.

So where, exactly, is the rabbit hole? And am I in it or not in it?

These are the sorts of questions that can drive a person mad, particularly when they’re still at issue after many years.

Are they the sorts of questions for which answers grounded in relativism are apropos, or are such appearances merely artifacts of, and evidence of, a perspective from within said rabbit hole?

Life, life, life, you are a tiring sort of thing. Or at least, you have too frequently been thus for me. I sense that there are others to which you have given boundless energy. So come on, level with me—what did I do wrong? Is it because I didn’t fully appreciate your generosity as a kid? Let me say—for the record—that it’s not that I didn’t appreciate your generosity so much as that I was run over by its—I’ll say—splendor.

— § —

“Hier ist alles unverändert
es sieht aus wie überall
die ganze Gegend liegt nicht auf meinen Wegen
und so komme ich eher selten hier vorbei

Hier sind die die gingen
und gegangen worden sind
hier sind die die bei denen ich vorkam
im letzten Film im Flug im freien Fall
die meisten sind immer noch hungrig
dabei gibt es nicht einmal mehr Zigaretten
so halten sie sich fest an den Ideen

Manche gehen spazieren oder denken nach
fahren schwarz mit Bus und U-Bahn
oder stehen einfach da und warten ab
auch die die nicht mehr warten konnten
haben hier nichts anderes zu tun
besonders nachts plagt alle Langeweile

There’s a place around the corner
where your dead friends live.
There’s a place around the corner
where your dead friends live…”

— § —

The first novel that I ever read in the middle of the night, cover to cover and under bedding with a flashlight (as goes the classic trope), was “Harriet the Spy.” Until then, I’d presumed that reading was something that one did only during waking hours, while sitting on the sofa.

The fact that I didn’t stop reading when I went to bed, and didn’t stop reading as I pulled the covers over myself to stay warm (necessitating the use of a flashlight), and in fact was still reading at three o’clock in the morning, came as a complete surprise to me.

— § —

On my office wall hangs a small dry-erase whiteboard on which I’ve given myself, in black marker, “grades” on my progress in various projects.

It shows a grade of “C” in recent progress toward the completion of my dissertation, which I have now not only completed, but in fact defended as far back as early 2014. It’s a dry-erase board. And the marker is as black as it was on the day on which the grades were written. Whenever that was.

QED.

— § —

“I could not become anything; neither good nor bad; neither a scoundrel nor an honest man; neither a hero nor an insect…”

— § —

Whatever. That’s what they say, isn’t it?

Whatever.

It sounds like a Facebook update:

“Eating Chinese with the kids while watching Nature documentaries on Owls and Coywolves.”

There’s no picture to go along with it. The Chinese is home-made. I am an unkempt mess. It has been a long couple of days.

— § —

Right now, I wish I could take the back off of a mechanical chronometer or an automatic watch and just stare at the gears moving for hours.

Or maybe I wish I could load up a classic Genesis game like Flashback and play it for hours.

Okay, I don’t know what I wish. Maybe that’s where I am right now. I don’t know what I wish for.

— § —

I’m surrounded by an immense amount of creativity technology. Laptops, tablets, smartphones, smartpens, Alphasmarts, Newtons, Photoshop, Lightroom, digital cameras, pens and pencils, paints and canvases, modeling clay and I’m sure more stuff that I haven’t even mentioned.

And now what?

It’s like I’m waiting for the messiah so that I can write the hymn, sometimes.

— § —

Okay, I lied before. The kids aren’t eating. The kids never eat. That’s one of the things about kids.

I’d like to go to bed early tonight and read a book. I’m sure they have other ideas. Oh well, that’s how it goes.

— § —

Sometimes I make blog posts just to know that I’m still alive. This is one of those times. I don’t have anything to say. I don’t know what there is to say. I am doing precisely what the critics are talking about when the criticize blogs as being so much navel-gazing.

I am navel-gazing. I am. Because I have to do something. And I don’t want to do any of the things that I think I ought to be doing. So I’m doing this instead.

Just to feel the reassuring tactile feedback that the computer keyboard provides.

And I’m not lying there. It is reassuring. It is so reassuring that it’s almost sick at this point. Someday, when they invent direct mind-to-data transfers, I will be amongst the older generation of luddites that refuses to give up the keyboard. Because I need it. The feeling of the keyboard is more important to me at this point than my own heartbeat.

When someday I get arthritis so bad that I can’t type any longer, I will quickly go insane.

Archives »

May 2026
April 2026
March 2026
February 2026
January 2026
December 2025
July 2025
May 2025
April 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
September 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
June 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
March 2012
December 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999