耀
a
r
o
6
e
d
g
2
l
p
a
n

a
r
o
n
h
s
i
a
o
w
a
s
h
e
r
e

 

 

I’ve been in tech now for a long time. They say the American economy is incredibly productive, and the engine of the world. Here’s why we should be more worried than we are about the substance of our economy.

Types of Non-commodity Products Sold in America

The nonstandard standard item. You buy a sedan and when you take delivery, it doesn’t have wheels, and there are no options to add wheels. You call them and say “um, this isn’t what a ‘street legal sedan’ is supposed to be” and they say “it meets 90 percent of the standard and it’s 100 percent street legal.” You say “but it can’t move, how can it be street legal?” They say it is legal to move it on the street on the back of a tow truck. You say “this is ridiculous, I can’t use this.” They say “we do not guarantee fitness for any particular purpose, did you not read the end user agreement?”

The just-in-time item. You buy a sedan from a “lean, efficient” company with a promise that your car will be delivered in three months once it’s manufactured. What you don’t realize is that they know they won’t deliver in three months because the factory doesn’t exist yet and in fact there isn’t even a blueprint yet. They plan to use the revenue from all the car purchases to design and then manufacture the cars. They have set an “aggressive timeline” of one year to delivery based on preliminary “market research” saying that only 40 percent of customers will cancel the order before a year is up. They also have a “stretch goal” of three quarters for delivery of the first car.

Eighteen months on, you are receiving breathless updates via email and snail mail about how great it’s going to be and how amazing progress is. Meanwhile, they have raised three more venture rounds. In another month, they wind down, thank everyone, talk about “all they’ve learned,” and the C suite walks away with millions. You never get your car.

The recurring revenue model item. You buy a sedan and when it arrives, the ignition key doesn’t seem to do anything—no start. So you call them up and they explain that for the ignition to be “enabled,” you need to subscribe to their “ignition key” service at $10 per month or you can save money by paying for a year at a time for $99 per year, or $80 per year if you pay for three years in advance. You grit your teeth and pay for three years of “ignition key” but then find that you can’t shift it into reverse to back out of your driveway. They tell you that you can subscribe to the “reverse gear” service for an additional $10 per month, or that you can get it as part of the “whole transmission bundle” which only runs $49 per month…

The low-cost item. You buy a sedan and think you got a very good deal as it was only $8,999 new. You start to drive down the street and within the first mile, the right passenger side wheel begins to wobble. As you try to limp to the mechanic, you realize that you are slowing down no matter how far you press the accelerator, you eventually can’t get past 10 miles per hour. Then, as you pull in to the mechanic, the steering wheel comes off. Your mechanic takes a look and says, “the problem here is that most of these parts are made of cheap plastic or literal tinfoil, bonded into thicker material by gluing layers of tinfoil together with cheap adhesive.”

You contact the company and they offer you either 10 percent credit toward an identical replacement or five percent cash refund. They explain that they can’t give you any more than that since it’s damaged. You balk and they explain that perhaps this isn’t the right product for you as it was never advertised as being useful for “heavy duty applications” such as driving down the street. Meanwhile, positive reviews continue to roll in to the website as it dawns on you that they’re probably all astroturfed.

The not a customer customer item. You browse the website about a sedan, put down a $10 deposit to be guaranteed a spot as one of the “first 100,000 deliveries” if you decide to buy. Based on this $10 deposit, the manufacturer counts you among 100,000 sales for the full value of the car in their reporting. You decide you don’t want the car, but they continue to send apparent bills demanding payment, though these aren’t backed up by any teeth as you have agreed to nothing. In between these demands, you receive slick communications thanking you for being a customer and for being a part of the sedan’s “community.”

They use their initial 100,000 “sales” and all that booked “LTV” to do several funding rounds at which point they can actually build a car, though not a great one. When they deliver the first actual car to the first actual customer, they hold a big investor event celebrating their 100,001st customer and the “incredible success” they’ve had “in such a short period of time.”

The baitish and switchish item. You buy an alternate-marque sedan because it’s supposed to be based on the platform and use the components from another major auto manufacturer, but at a lower price. When you take delivery, however, it looks dissimilar from the photos and marketing materials in troubling ways, though not in significant enough ways to be clearly the wrong item. Quality looks somewhat lower, and some of the design cues you really liked are different in what you received. Worse, over time as you own the car and find the reliability to be low, your mechanic repeatedly informs you that the parts are not from the major auto manufacturer you thought they were from.

When you ask other owners, you start to realize that there are many “versions” of this car out there, with parts from a wide variety of manufacturers. Turns out they buy parts on the “spot market” on price, and adjust designs as they go to be able to use the lowest-priced parts at any given time. Ultimately you determine that you got one of the “bad versions” though you’re happy for your friends, who mostly bought the “good versions.”

The vertical integration meets rent-seeking item. You buy sedan with great features and great quality and are initially thrilled, but you are surprised on the second day when you turn onto a particular street and it just dies. You get a tow back to your house and suddenly it seems to work again. Then the next day again you turn onto a different street, and once again it just dies. You contact the manufacturer, who explains that the car drives only on “approved” streets owned either by the manufacturer or by one of its “partners.” They refer you to their website, where the list of “current partners,” which seems to change monthly or so, lets you know which streets you can drive on today. At your first fill-up, you’re no longer surprised to learn that you also can only use fuel from the manufacturer or one of it’s “approved partners” and there is a page on their website for fuel as well…

The manufacturing partner item. You buy a sedan from a “manufacturer” but at your first warranty service, you’re directed to an obscure dealership that you’ve never heard of that doesn’t seem to actually sell cars, just service cars like the one that you bought. You soon learn that actually your car is identical to another car that sells overseas for a fourth of the price. The only difference is the paint and the badge.

After some digging, you find out that the “manufacturer” exists only on paper in this country; they are essentially a marketing department to advertise and a finance department to collect money. The overseas manufacturer makes cars for lots of different companies of this kind worldwide, not at particularly high quality levels.

As you look at marketing materials for all the companies around the world who “sell” this car, you realize that the real manufacturer does almost all the marketing and all the finance as well—when they sign up a new “sales partner” in a country, they provide this sales partner with all the materials, television ads, campaigns, software to run finance, etc. It’s actually somewhat unclear just what the “manufacturer” in your country does, other than pay a one-time fee to become the “exclusive sales channel” in your country for the real manufacturer. When you go to the real manufacturer’s website, you find that it’s listed as a “turnkey business” and in fact they have a ready line of major capital providers lined up to help new “businesses” around the world to start selling their cars, rebadged, in new international markets.

You realize you’re never going to be able to get parts, or service, or even talk to a real person in your own language about it. You try to sell it but soon realize it’s just going to live in your backyard forever as you buy a new, proper car…

Bubble, Bubble, Toil and Trouble

Have I missed any? As I said, I’ve been in tech for a long time, which—let’s face it—is really just about everything these days. It’s hard to think of a product category that isn’t tech.

The thing is, the above practices aren’t considered bad. They’re considered best practices, ways to “execute,” to be “lean,” to “drive shareholder value,” to “enable rapid scaling,” etc. If you aren’t doing one of the above things—if you just sort of plod along making honest, good quality things and delivering them to customers to grow at a few percent CAGR (“compound annual growth rate”), investors will absolutely punish you. And ironically, so will consumers, who seem to focus more on the Instragram presence of a company and its products than on actual product fitness—and companies that focus their dollars on “product fitness” and growing within their means based on real deliveries to real customers who have real experiences with them… those companies don’t have spare venture money to invest in an entire glossy social media team or a high-dollar “marketing partner.”

A lot of dollars move around in our economy, and a lot of business is done. A lot of consumers and a lot of companies go into debt to participate in this economy, and that generates a lot of growth productivity, and new dollars on the books.

But the thing is, it’s all fake. The list above is probably 80 percent of the actual products and services out there, and it’s not real. In another era, this wouldn’t have been “tremendous exciting growth,” it would have been “smoke and mirrors and dishonest business practices.” A whole huge bunch of our economy is actually not real economic activity in the sense of efficiently distributing valuable resources that can and will be used in the production of society. It’s nonsense for Instagram (both for producer and consumer) and nonsense for the financial books (both for producer and investor, who these days is also consumer).

This is just one small part of our problems, but it is the problem with actual hard goods and services delivery, which is often presumed to be the “real” part of the economy, as opposed to the financialized assets and business lines.

Fact is, almost none of it is “real.” Most of our economy is a bubble of fake money used to purchase or deliver fake goods and services. The numbers are big, but the underlying substance is relatively small.

So if you’re one of the handful of personal contacts that actually reads this (or one of the random bouncing strangers that has stumbled on something curious and probably boring), things look slightly different.

To you, that is. To me, they look significantly different, as I’ve spent the last week of evenings (and the entirety of a Saturday) refreshing the guts of the site, finally.

There was a time when I refreshed them regularly once every year or at most every couple of years. That was the way it was back in 1999–2005 when this whole site was static pages generated to be a “site” via bash scripts that auto-uploaded via FTP (well, apart from that period when I was hosting it myself on a Sparc IPX, those were the days).

Then it was Graymatter for a while, and then WordPress and then Drupal for a while and then back to WordPress and… Things hadn’t really been refreshed under the hood since about 2013.

To give you some indication, I had been using a completely self-coded body of PHP and CSS on WordPress on top of the BlankSlate (no styling whatsoever, no widgets, no nothing) base theme. Last time I updated “everything,” I was still building my own site essentially from the ground up (well, okay, using WordPress to manage a DB, and to be fair, that’s a lot, but to be conversely fair I even had some pipes built from the shell environment because sometimes I still liked to do things manually from bash).

Anyway, this has been overdue for a long time. I work on a lot of websites and things that are halfway website halfway browser application, and in a whole world of Node.js and Vue and Elementor and other modern stuff, my own personal website was a bunch of hand-crafted CSS and PHP typed into Sublime on a WordPress instance that had been gathering debris for like a decade and a half. Well, those days are finally officially over.

We look the same on the surface, but under the hood from a management perspective we’re lean and mean and hand-coding only where it counts now and as a force multiplier, the rest in a modern block-oriented template system. Yes, there is still a minor amount of my own code to do stuff like pull archives and maintain the list of favorite posts and so on, but now it’s all done properly as a plugin rather than being inline <?php ?> everywhere spread throughout the universe. I figured it was time to do it right, even if it is “just” for my own site.

This year has also seen me switch web hosts as well.

I expect things that are broken to pop up here and there, especially at first (and especially typefaces and images from the past, where I’ve had a habit of linking across DBs and filesystems rather than making things local to one host and instance… which I’m now paying for). But they’ll get sorted out in time. I thought it was time to flip over to the new instance “today, come hell or high water” (hence me writing this at 1:15 in the morning).

But in any case, welcome to Leapdragon 2023. Finally. Which will hopefully unlock the ability to more easily do some of the other stuff I want to do here (without getting buried in a morass of going back through my own hastily tossed together personal website code, as was the case before).

My daughter asked me tonight what I did when my grandparents died.

At first I said, “there’s not much you can do,” but then upon reflection, I tried to explain—doing a terrible job of it—what I did, and what I do, which is everything, in a way.

Everything I do I do for the people whose blood I share. Those who came before me and those who came after me. There is nothing else; and for all of them there is something rather than nothing.

Unfortunately this is not the sort of thing you can explain to someone, child or adult, that doesn’t already understand it, so for now it will go unclarified. But maybe someday she will understand it.

My general experience of life has been that it is sad. Life is a deeply, deeply sad thing.

That’s not to say that it’s not worth living; it’s worth it in the same way that it’s worth the effort to read a tragic—but beautiful and well-written—novel.

But I honestly can’t relate to those who suggest that it’s joyful, or exhilarating, etc. I’ve never seen it, not in my own life, and not in the lives of those I know.

Sometimes life does not go according to plan, and you find yourself in a tough spot.

Then you think to yourself, “What should I do?”

Archives »

April 2026
March 2026
February 2026
January 2026
December 2025
July 2025
May 2025
April 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
September 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
June 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
March 2012
December 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999