耀
a
r
o
6
e
d
g
2
l
p
a
n

a
r
o
n
h
s
i
a
o
w
a
s
h
e
r
e

 

 

that is open at a library table as I arrive:

“…Photomicrography, Matches, Boy Scouts, Forestry, Marine Sport Fisheries, Metals, Distilling, Minor Arts, Salvation Army, Mycology, Agriculture, Geology, Photography and Motion Pictures, Dogs, Music, Sociology, Forestry, Plant Pathology, Etymology: Romantic and Celtic, Tea, Taxonomy, Card Games, Gambling Games, Zoology, Railroads, Color and Colorimetry, Ferns, Applied Photography and Equipment, Chemistry of Photography, Industrial Management, Icthyology, Navigation and Seamanship, Paints and Varnish, Ecology, Physics, Christian Science, Glass, Fishes, Tropical Fishes, Hardware…”

The entire world exists thanks only to a certain suspension of disbelief. This can break down suddenly and without warning, leaving you at the center of a maelstrom, an infantile attendee at a miasmic circus of lights and maniacal laughter.

never done nor undone
and without words, buried in the crux
of an empty high-rise building in New York, you
are the man of repetitions,
the harbinger of recurrent dreams,
the anonymous, indigenous calendric cycle,
inexact and unmarked;
not quite forgotten,
you are rather not yet lived—
deep green and embryonic amidst endless fields of crimson,
a deferred death,
an incarceration in a womb,
apart from apotheosis, embracing those ephemeral junctures
that lie beyond the ferrous light
whose boundary circumscribes your history
and your unheard,
ceaseless

breath

In the breast of a steel lion rides a heart indistinguishable from a common clump of dormant tulip bulbs. When he runs, deferred fertility passes noiselessly over the plain of Africa, held prisoner by motion, embodied being, and the tyranny of ecological context. When he dies, the bulbs decay long before the body rusts into submission. They would not have grown anyway.

Libraries are spaces of learning, certainly, but they are also spaces that draw futility into exaggerated relief. Tonight, here, I see a universe I will never fully inherit, no matter how long and hard I try.

Also, I feel a little odd.

Not in a bad way, necessarily.

When I first started reading I was told that the key to knowledge was the written word. That is to say that if one were to assemble the correct body of work—a precise, arcane, and enlightening project in its own right—and one were to read this collection deeply and often enough, one could understand everything that there is to know about being—about living and dying and existing and what it is all for and what everything ultimately… means.

Only in recent years have I realized (with some surprise) that I’d clung to this very belief without realizing it, always searching for the “right” books and reading them voraciously for signs and wonders, trying to assemble the body of understanding that I implicitly presumed (without being conscious of the presumption) would grant me some kind of absolution. Instead, with the realization came the requisite loss of the belief.

To have lost the belief that somewhere, in some combination of ideas lies a kind of transcendental rebirth is actually a kind of damnation, but it is also a kind of liberation, if from nothing else than from the prospect that one might actually have to read and re-read everything ever written in order to achieve salvation.

Printing is a prophetic technology, modern personal printers too, in much the same way as typewriters and presses. Today in particular they operate (or rather, are operated) only because we have faith in their ability to deliver knowledge to the future at the time that we engage them. There is no knowledge stored in them, and comparatively little knowledge is embodied in them. In fact they are now removed by several steps from knowledge. They are tools operated by thinking machines operated by demigods exercising little more than belief. But as tools, they project texts safely and simply ahead for generations, something that neither the demigods nor their thinking machines alone are able to do. As a result, what printing machines actually do embody, now in the “information age” more than ever, is the quaint notion of an uninterruptible continuum between present and future, and the Euclidean curve along which the future is therefore ultimately delivered to the present. Through them we can thus know what is to come in a way not possible through “online” texts or verbal communication.

All of this is also bound up in some way with inertia, which is the greatest prophetic force known to mankind, an obvious thing that’s rarely (if ever) said, since it’s so self-evident. But sometimes it’s helpful to notice such things.

All language is performative. Sometimes simply engaging in acts of communication (written, spoken, alexical, whatever) thus makes me feel disingenuous.

Years ago now while I was in computer science I dabbled in trying to design a purely imperative, highly structured human language. The result was a mode of schematic thought in which one was incredibly aware of the process of declaration, i.e. all state expressions had to be reconstructed as imperatives (many of them modal and scoped) that clearly demonstrated the intentionality of the speaker/writer to communicate and to do so with precision. They were thus implicitly social and also democratic in nature. I was not a linguist of course, and I was really young, maybe eighteen, so it was full of problems and naïveté, but I did write a lot of poetry in it and found it to be a strange and unique mode of expression.

I still have data from that time period on my PC, but it’s completely unintelligible now because the character and rule sets for the language are in formats only easily accessible from OS9 platforms and these are today by and large extinct and probably not worth the effort to try to reimplement, the data too fragmentary to reverse engineer.

This is the realization of information mortality (and thus of time as well), something implicitly posited during classical periods and the Enlightenment, but not perfected until late modernity’s “information age,” which ought rightly to be called (as Google or eBay would tell you), the “age of filtration.”

Hurm. When your blog posts look like this, you know it’s time for bed. Good night all.

Archives »

April 2026
March 2026
February 2026
January 2026
December 2025
July 2025
May 2025
April 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
September 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
June 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
March 2012
December 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999