耀
a
r
o
6
e
d
g
2
l
p
a
n

a
r
o
n
h
s
i
a
o
w
a
s
h
e
r
e

 

 

There are many posts over the years that I have wanted to make but haven’t made. Some of them I’ve created as drafts again and again, but never published. Some of them I’ve published and then pulled back. I’ll be honest and say that most of this hiding out despite wanting to say something publicly was because I was afraid of upsetting significant others, family, friends, and so on.

But ’tis the season for me to lay it all on the line and let people know who they’re dealing with. If I end up alone and have to start life over, so be it.

So let’s see how many of these “I’ve protected other peoples’ feelings for long enough and now its time for me to reveal myself” posts I can knock out in one day, shall we?

— § —

I am an introvert.

I am not shy. (Ask my wife, or any of my friends, or any of my former students for that matter.)

And it is not a disease. Or a weakness. Or something that needs to be remedied.

In fact, I get terribly offended when people imply that there’s something wrong with the way that I am. There f**king isn’t. If you can’t be comfortable with the idea of introverts, it’s more likely that there’s something wrong with the way you are. I’ve long suspected that extroverts who spend their time trying arduously to get introverts to make a dozen new friends are actually projecting their own deep fears and unfulfillable need for validation onto said introverts. They are vaguely terrified to see that someone is often alone, or doesn’t have too many friends, and that is okay with it. It triggers something for them. Just my guess.

— § —

It’s not hard for me to make friends. I just don’t make a lot of them. And here’s why. There have been times in my life—times when I was feeling lonely, or when things were trending downward, or when I was just bored—when I took someone’s advice to “put myself out there” and “make friends” and so on, and I did. It’s not impossible. The steps are pretty easy. I speak English. And I’m a nice guy.

So what did I end up with? A lot of people that I genuinely cared about that wanted to see me all the time. And then I’d have to say no. Because it was exhausting and annoying. And then I felt terrible. Because I really did care about them and I really did feel as though they were my friends. I just plain didn’t want to see them most of the time. I wanted to do my stuff. Read my books. Work on my projects. Hell, just sit and reflect. Go for a hike. I preferred to do my plain old introverty stuff, and not in a group. And as a result, I hurt people. And I had to suffer through the awkward conversations and the pain that comes along with making people feel as though you’re rejecting them all the time.

And after each of the periods in my life during which I’ve gone on such a friend-making binge, usually for conscious put-it-all-out-there reasons, naively thinking I was “doing the healthy thing” (largely on advice of extroverts) and feeling tremendously exhausted by the process, I’ve ended up letting all of those friendships taper off and away. And that’s painful, too. But not as painful as having to deal with all of them all the time and try to explain that I just don’t need to see my friends all that much, and in fact I prefer not to. Lots of times, I just like to know that they exist and that’s enough for me. In fact, it is often preferable.

But here’s the thing. People seem to think that this is some sort of disease. That the fact that I made a whole bunch of friends and then let those friendships slowly wither means that I need some kind of therapy for it. That the natural state of life is to have a massive social circle and to go out and talk every night and to prefer to work in groups and to ask for advice from a crop of heads and so on. That I need to be fixed.

I do not f**king need to be fixed. There is nothing wrong with being an introvert. It is a way to be. Just like being a lumberjack, or a Buddhist, or gendered male (or female). It is a way to be. A perfectly legitimate, functional, fine way to be. Many, many very successful and historically important people have been introverts. Introversion confers many distinct advantages, not least amongst them the ability to get things done—largely because introverts can just sit down and put in hours when they feel inspired, rather than using a significant portion of those hours to socialize instead. And when this happens, it feels good. For introverts, flow is nirvana.

Indeed, many, many very happy people are introverts. Only they are not happy all the time because nobody is f**king happy all the time, and the fact that they are not happy at any particular moment is not “due to their introversion” any more than the fact that extroverts are unhappy and liberally sharing their hurt with a hundred different people on any given day is “due to their extroversion.”

— § —

It is work for me to socialize. With my children. With my wife. With my self, even.

It is good work. Joyful work. The most valuable work in life. I could never live without it. I would be devastated without it, particularly in the case of my wife and kids.

But it is work. Even socializing on Facebook is work that I do because it is needed. That is what it means to be an introvert, nothing less, nothing more. It does not leave me feeling energized to have a conversation, even with my closest, closest friend or with a circle of family, and even if the conversation is fabulous and fulfilling. It leaves me more tired than when the conversation started. That does not mean that it catastrophically expends me to have interactions. A lot of people have over-read into the things they’ve consumed online about introversion and come to imagine that an introvert is somehow deeply damaged by social interaction of any kind. No. It’s just work. Fulfilling work, important work, work that at times I long to do (say, with my wife, whom I in fact want very much to see and interact with every day). But it is work. Again, nothing less, nothing more.

And so, as a result, I consciously limit the number of close friends and close relationships I have in my life. Because I can’t sustain too many of them and I don’t want to hurt people by just plain not having the energy for them. You can’t sustain relationships that you don’t nurture anyway, and I simply can’t nurture too many. That’s just the way it is.

This does mean that I rely on the friendships that I do keep more than an extrovert might rely on their friendships. When the chips are down, I don’t have fifty different people that I can call. I have a handful. Yes, I could go out and get fifty different people once again, just to have more people to talk to when the chips are down, but the thing is that I wouldn’t talk to them anyway. Instead, they’d be “checking in” on me and asking me how I’m doing and showing up at my door with snacks and all of that really, really nice stuff that would make me want to pull my hair out for the extra work if, in fact, the chips were down. When the chips are down, more than at other times, I need the space to just do my stuff. And contrary to what extroverts tend to say, you can’t just do your stuff as an introvert if you’re not alone. Because non-introverts that try to accompany you in stuff-doing sessions, well… They talk to you. They can’t help themselves. And that means you’re not getting to do your stuff. It’s like an itch that needs to be scratched. You get impatient. You stop being a good listener. You long to extract yourself from the situation and just be alone again so that you can… do your stuff.

So I’ve learned my lesson over the years. A handful of people. Keep them close when you do talk to them. Bare your soul. Let them bare theirs. Be economical and encourage everyone to lay it all on the line without beating around the bush. And the rest of the time, let them be them over there, and I’ll be me over here and we don’t have to spend half of every living day chatting about nothing in particular. Because introverts can’t do nothing in particular very well. Everything in an introvert’s life is, in fact, something in particular. The nothings-in-particular, they got discarded a long time ago—and it is extra work to have to recover them, much less to then have to talk about them as a matter of mere politeness.

— § —

I don’t think all of this is an issue for anyone in my life right now. But it has been in the past, with some people. And I’ve never blogged about it in just this way, head on. And I’ve just seen a meme that made me want to scratch this itch.

So I’ll just say, on behalf of all the introverts out there: if you can’t handle friendship with an introvert—being not one of a hundred, but one of six, or one of three—if it makes you feel worried or pressured that someone doesn’t have too, too many friends other than yourself or that they seem to want to immediately open their heart to you and expect you to expeditiously open your heart to them—then politely excuse yourself from being friends with the introvert in question and say that it all just plain weirds you out. They’ll be okay. They’ll be grateful. I promise.

Whatever you do, don’t make it your project to come at them from a “place of caring” and try to fill their lives with people and smalltalk all while maintaining your distance, just to make yourself feel better.

They will not thank you for it in the long run. And you also won’t feel better in the long run being friends with them, if that’s the way you feel.

— § —

Mini-manifesto over.

You know that you’re a “real” blogger not when you get paid to do it, not when you have a post go viral, not even when you’ve spent decades in your career doing it for companies of all kinds and sizes.

No, you know when you have finally given in and given up on any other aspirations in a realistic way when you make your fisrt post about sex.

So here it goes. It’s gonna be short.

— § —

I don’t know if it’s this way for other guys, but I am coming to learn that it is this way for me. Here comes the line that will create problems and disagreements and criticisms and so on. But:

In myself, at least, intimacy requires sex. It is the one and only key to bringing down the inner walls. Without it, as time passes, the walls, they go up. They just do.

I suspect that our therapist and an army of concerned people (let’s be honest, many of them women) might disagree. Tell me that it’s precisely the point in my case that I have to break through those walls with pure, unadulterated metacognition and trust.

I don’t buy it. I’ve been alive for a long time. I can only say what I deeply, deeply feel. Sex is the emotional ocean beneath the surface. The wellspring of deep feeling. The core of connection. For me, sex is exactly synonymous with trust, feeling, and commitment as a package. They cannot be separated. The presence of one is the presence of the other. The absence of one is the absence of the other.

It just is. Sex opens parts of my brain and parts of my heart that otherwise are closed. And their natural state is to be closed. They have to be opened anew each time, regularly, or they are quickly and simply inaccessible to me (much less to others).

— § —

This goes rather clearly with the love languages post I made earlier.

People don’t seem to believe that guys are ever wired this way. But I am. And there is no getting around it.

And if I am wired this way, there must be other men that are, too. Take it under advisement, any of you in the “all men are predators constantly and sleazily seeking meaningless sex” camp.

I couldn’t have meaningless sex if my life depended on it. And I couldn’t have a meaningful relationship that would survive very long without it.

I want to be reliable and rock solid.

But I also don’t want to be taken for granted. It’s one of my biggest things.

Problem is, these don’t really go together. If you are reliable enough, you will be taken for granted. That’s just human nature, and it’s a key part of why people like reliability anyway—so that they can, finally and after you have proven yourself, take you for granted.

How do I square this circle in my life? I either need to become more okay with less reliable or become okay with getting taken for granted.

The thing about kids is that if you let them get to you, you’re sunk. The only way not to go crazy is to stay emotionally above the fray. To remember that you’re the adult, you run the show, and at the end of the day they’re still gonna be there tomorrow, needing you just as much as they did today, so you can’t get caught up in drama, let yourself get worked, or let yourself get exhausted.

Say what you mean, do what you do, love them without caving to them, and let them figure out the rest. They’ll figure it out. They’re wired that way.

— § —

The thing about emotional needs is that while everyone has them, the fundamentals of fulfilling them have less to do with other people than they have to do with your own self.

If you know what you need, you’ll get your needs met.

If your needs aren’t being met, then you don’t actually know what you need. Maybe this is because you can’t face it, or maybe it’s because life is confusing. But if you go for extended periods of time in a “my needs are not being met” frame of mind, some introspection is probably in order.

— § —

Even so, and apropos of my last post, it’s not always easy to do the right thing, to do what is necessary or what you’re sure is the thing that you ought to do. But then, there is no reason it should be easy.

I’m not going to say that “nobody ever said it would be easy” because, in fact, that’s not true. Way too many people and pundits and zen-better-your-life-gurus and BFFs out in the world tend to say that it’s easy or to speak in platitudes that make it sound as though it is supposed to be easy.

But that’s bullshit. Life is hard. Get a helmet. Doing what needs to be done can break you. That’s just the way it is.

But growing up is when you realize that not doing what needs to be done will break you harder.

Life is a kind of least-of-all-evils (or, more optimistically, best-I-can-do) balancing act. There’s no way around that.

If life was ever easy, there would be someone on record amongst the smartest, wisest, or most successful people in history that had an easy life as evidence for this possibility. What you see in every biography, instead, is trouble and pain and suffering as far as the eye can see.

There is no known antidote, to date, for entropy. Nobody can hold it together because it can’t be held together.

But it’s just like raising kids. Either you can let it get to you, in which case it can and will overtake and overrun you, or you can appreciate what is, make your peace, do what needs to be done, and let the chips fall where they may.

— 6 —

Did I just paraphrase Bobby McFerrin in long prose?

“Don’t worry. Be happy.”

– Things can be right without their being easy
– Contradictory facts can in fact both be true
– Just because one day is bad doesn’t mean the next one will be
– That a decision is yours doesn’t mean it isn’t also someone else’s
– Making choices is not the same as controlling (or even knowing) outcomes
– Twenty-four hours is a much longer time than a single day
– Watching the time and taking the time are separate things
– Space cannot be eliminated; only filled—and not all of it
– Light and truth share the same quadratic falloff function
– You can want to share with someone without it being about them
– Little boys dream about forces and their environments
– Patience is another word for respiration
– Inside every child is an adult; inside every adult is a child
– The proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem says nothing about the Riemann Hypothesis
– Heat or light, it’s all radiation
– Hope for the Riemann Hypothesis lives because Fermat’s Last Theorem was proven
– Children and adults are not the same inside
– Respiration is the most critical property of patients
– Environments force little boys’ dreams
– You can want to be with someone even while you can’t share with them
– Quadratic falloff functions impart the evidentiary properties of light
– Not all forms of elimination create space
– Separating time from watches is a good way to take it
– Every day the world is reborn in twenty-four hours
– Controlling (and knowing) outcomes is a sound way to eliminate choices
– That a decision was someone else’s doesn’t mean it wasn’t also yours
– Believing that tomorrow will be bad makes today so
– Deep truths are the hidden forces that fabricate facts
– Things can be easy without their being right

The concept of the “five love languages,” though probably a bit simplistic, has become fully embedded in popular culture at this point, and it’s an idea with enough merit (in my uninformed opinion, based purely on experience and intuition) to warrant some reflection on just what my “love languages” might be.

I’ve read the book in the past, and given some thought to this over time, but I’ve always had trouble figuring out what my love languages are. It’s a deceptively complex question to get at what sorts of things make you “feel loved” over time, particularly if you’re someone who’s always felt a bit starved for love.

But I’m going to go over these here, in public, to try to get a handle on this for myself once and for all. Uh, for the moment.

So the love languages, presented in the order in which they appear on the Wikipedia page, are:

— § —

(1) Gifts. This one is difficult for me to assess. From the time I was a small child until now, I can honestly say that I’ve received very few gifts that felt as though people were actually taking me, as me, into account when buying them. So I don’t have much of a sample size to think about when I try to remember how I feel when people give me (i.e. the real me, with thought and affection) gifts.

The vast majority of the gifts I’ve received over the course of my life caused me to immediately think either “this person doesn’t know me at all” or “they had to buy a gift for this occasion, and now it’s my job to thank them for the gift.” Two gifts stand out, after all this time. Both from my wife.

First, an inscripted copy of a vintage Hemmwingay hardcover. I remember every last thing about the moment that she gave this to me, because it meant so much to me. It was a very special gift. Second, a tiny bell, made out of wood, metal, and string, which I also loved. After forty years of gifts, these are the two that I remember.

It’s not that I didn’t appreciate other gifts that people have given me as such, or that it didn’t mean something to me that someone took the time and spent the effort and resources to give me a gift. It’s just that these two felt as though they were for me, first and foremost, rather than for the particular occasion first, and only afterward for me.

And in both cases, they made me feel very loved and very special. So it’s hard for me to evaluate this one. Does the paucity of memorable moments mean that this isn’t a love language for me, or does it mean, in fact, that it is, and that therefore I am highly discerning about the gifts that I receive because in fact I am evaluating them for what meausre of love they might carry?

I’ll have to come back to this one.

— § —

(2) Quality time. This one is colored by early family life for me, I think. I’m fairly sure this is not one of my love languages as a result.

I come from a family of enforced “quality time.” A sort of “we’re going to spent time together today for three hours and you’re all going to bask in the glow of family love and happines, dammit, so quit your whining and I don’t care what else you’ve go to do” arrangement

As a result, all of that together time precisely lost its specialness. While I respect the importance of quality time, and I’m coming to value it more and more as I get older and try to navigate the very important waters of my own family as a father, it has traditionally been hard for me to feel that time together carries a particular message.

The enforced quality time of my childhood essentially seaparated time from feeling for me, caused me to disassociate the two, because here we were spending “quality time together” frequently, yet my feelings about the time and the people I was with at the moment were always totally irrelevant to the activity.

So quality time became in the end not reflective of love, but reflective of nothing in particular. In fact, for many years it felt like a burdensome responsibility, as though it was even possible that quality time is what you do try to have when you don’t feel love but are trying to pretend (or convince yourself) that you do. A kind of inadequate mask for insecurities, regrets, and wish-it-were-otherwises.

As I said, I’m coming around, particularly because I think this one matters a great deal to my wife; it may be one of her love languages, and this is one of the disconnects that existed between us for a long time. But there is still a ways for me to go.

And certainly it is not one of my love languages, traditionally. I love to spend time with my loved ones, and I am sad when I can’t, but it doesn’t “make me feel loved” that someone wants to spend time with me, in itself. It’s far more important what they do and say during that time. Spending six hours together during which nobody says an “I love you” is at least as likely to make me feel unloved (all that opporunity to express love, yet it didn’t happen, what’s the matter?!) as it is to make me feel loved.

Which brings us to…

— § —

(3) Words of affirmation. This one is also fraught for me as a matter of childhood. I received endless words of affirmation as a child, but these were often contradicted by endless and intermixed words of criticism and reproach, and often all of these felt rote.

So I do have a tendency to be dismissive of words. It may not affect me all that much if someone tells me that they love me or that I’m doing a fabulous job if it feels as though they have to say it, or if it feels as though there is some ulterior motive, or if it feels as though it wasn’t a well-considered statement.

At the same time, apropos of what I said above, and keeping in mind that I am also highly vulnerble to criticism from people that I love (yet not at all from strangers, from whom I take take both harsh criticism and constructive criticism without any particular injury), it’s clear that words can and do have a deep connection to my emotional well being, particularly words from significant figures in my life.

I think the key here is that they do in fact have to be words of affirmation, i.e. affirming my importance to them, affirming their regard for me, affirming the value that they place on the relationship. Simple “positive words” do not make me feel loved.

But if the underlying motivation that I read is to affirm, then they do, in fact, make me loved as almost nothing else can (and, more ominously, words of repudiation can be more destructive of my feelings and regard for someone and for our relationship together than almost anything else; repudiate me or a relationship with me verbally and I take it to be more or less final because the hurt is rather complete).

— § —

(4) Acts of service. This one is almost hard to evaluate because it seems too clear, so clear that I am suspicious of the conclusion. But it seems to me that this is the farthest from my love languages.

Again, my childhood nuclear family—and mandatory “service” of others in the home. The problem, of course, was that this was required whether anyone was feeling particularly loving or not, and that the service rendered was culturally normative, rather than personalized.

I’d say that I am almost allergic to acts of service. I have a tendency to view them with suspicion and to presume that the service being rendered will actually be unwelcome—with be carried out without any particular regard for my preferences and needs in life, and will thus be something that I have to work around and accept with a cheery face despite the fact that it may even be unhelpful.

I am unsure how I feel about acts of service that are, in fact, well considered and carried out with a deep understanding of myself and my needs. In fact, I can’t think of any instances of this in the past. What I can come up with are memories of what could be considered “verbal acts of service”. In fact, these positive memories of being heard and communicated with fall more properly under the heading of “words of affirmation.”

So I’ll stick to the initial impulse and say that I struggle not to find acts of service to be an imposition, and to accept them in the spirit in which they were intended (I’m getting better at this). But they are certainly not a “love language” for me.

— § —

(5) Physical touch. This one is the reason I’m writing this post today. Because, in fact, I’ve always considered this to be distinctly not a love language for me, and yet last night—last night I realized that I may have been wrong about it all along.

I came from a family that was both fairly enmeshed and fairly controlling of childrens’ feelings and emotions. There was a lot of touch (none of it inappropriate per se), but much of it was unwelcome. Demanded hugs and kisses. Fixed clothing and hair. Orders to sit on relatives’ laps to make them feel loved. And so on.

I’ve carred into adulthood a distinct revulsion at many kinds of physical touch. For example, a massage does nothing for me, and others’ insistence that I accept one from them (something of a cultural invariant) has always bordered on irritating and annoying to me. I want them to leave me alone and particuarly and especially not give me a massage.

The same goes for physical touch in public places, for entirely different reasons that have previously been unclear (but that are now becoming clear) to me.

But to cut to the chase, what I realized last night is that physical touch is absolutely important to me. Without it, I’m not sure that I can feel loved, no matter what else is going on. But it has to be given spontaneously, and not as a well-defined genre of touch, and it has to be initiated by them, an expression of their loving impulses toward me, not an acceptance of mine toward them.

Someone taking my hand absent-mindedly. Putting their arm around me as we talk. Leaning against me. Simple intimate bodily contact of this kind. When everything is going wrong for me in a relationship, when I am doubting it as much as I can possibly doubt it, when I am seeking an exit, a spontaneous and unconscious gesture like taking my hand or leaning against me and putting an arm around me can repair every bit of difficulty almost instantly.

But it can’t be a massage. Or a hand taken with the intent to communicate. It can’t be a task or a gesture. It has to be a momentary compulsion on their part, a little touch that they unconsciously want and need to make.

When I feel as though someone else can’t help but reach out and touch me—even the smallest of touches, when they are compulsions of love and feeling—real, authentic touches—that is probably the only time that I really genuinely feel their love for me and feel sure that it is real and present.

There is a paradox here in that touch in public often causes me to pull away—even loving touch. I am coming to realize this is because the level of vulnerability and intimacy that I tend to feel as the result of such touch is incompatible with public propriety. It feels weird to me to be that emotional in a public place, in other words.

— § —

A ridiculously long, navel-gazing post of this kind deserves a good, concise summary. So here it is:

– Gifts? Actually, yes, to some extent. But they must reflect real understanding of me and a real desire to reach me and be open to me, not merely the occasion at hand.

– Quality time? No, not really.

– Words of affirmation? Yes, very much so.

– Acts of service? Definitely, definitely not.

– Physical touch? Yes. So very yes! But with key caveats.

— § —

Yes, I realize that I’ve posted this in a public place. And if you read this far and aren’t quite satisfied with the experience, well—you have no one to blame but yourself.

All of these long and wordy entries lately, and yet in the end it’s really all the same nonsense that it always was before. Why? Why do I do this? What is the benefit? And yet I am positive that there must be one or I wouldn’t have kept it up all these years.

— § —

“Hell is other people.”

And yet, heaven is, too.

I think that has always been the crux of things. In an existence caught between heaven and hell, some of us just want to be “heard” in a way that implicates neither. That way is, in fact, to post on my blog.”

— § —

Laying in bed feeling exhausted but unable (unwilling?) to sleep.

All of these people that don’t blog or that say it’s an inappropriate thing to do… They are the people that lie to themselves so regularly that they no longer recognize the
lies as such.

— § —

Given my nickel allergy, I’ve long been in the habit of taking my wristwatch off every night before I go to sleep. And there it is now, on her nightstand.

Only tonight I feel the compelling impulse to put it back on and to wear it as I sleep. So I will.

Archives »

April 2026
March 2026
February 2026
January 2026
December 2025
July 2025
May 2025
April 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
September 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
June 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
March 2012
December 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999